Try 12 free Pennsylvania MPJE practice questions
Real exam-style questions taken word for word from the Pennsylvania MPJE study guide. Three are below, with the full answer explanation. Enter your email and the full 12-question PDF is yours.
Unlock the full sampler
Three questions to try right now
Work each one before you open the answer. These are the same style and depth the Pennsylvania MPJE expects.
Question 1. A Pennsylvania prescriber writes a Schedule II prescription for a large but clinically appropriate quantity, and the patient brings it to your pharmacy. On the ground of quantity alone, what is the correct action under Pennsylvania law?
- A. Refuse it, because Pennsylvania caps every Schedule II prescription at a 30-day supply.
- B. Fill it if otherwise valid; Pennsylvania imposes no general day-supply or quantity cap on Schedule II prescriptions.
- C. Fill only a 7-day supply and require the patient to return for the rest.
- D. Refuse it, because Schedule II prescriptions may never exceed a 72-hour supply.
Show the answer
Answer: B. Pennsylvania sets no general day-supply or quantity ceiling on a Schedule II prescription; quantity is governed by legitimate medical purpose and good-faith practice, mirroring federal law. A imports a 30-day cap that neither Pennsylvania nor federal law imposes. C borrows the Act 122 emergency-department opioid limit, which does not apply to an ordinary CII presented at the counter. D invents a 72-hour ceiling that belongs to a different rule entirely.
Question 2. A sales rep from a licensed distributor offers to drop off a bottle of a Schedule II product at your pharmacy "as a favor," with no invoice and no order record, to tide you over a shortage. Under federal law, what is the problem?
- A. Nothing; both parties are registered, so the transfer is lawful.
- B. The transfer would occur outside the documented, closed system the CSA requires; every transfer must run through registered parties and be recorded.
- C. It is lawful only if the quantity is under a 72-hour supply.
- D. It is lawful only if you notify the state board within 7 days.
Show the answer
Answer: B. The CSA builds a closed system in which every transfer of a controlled substance must move through registered parties and be documented. An undocumented handoff breaks that traceability even between two registrants. A is wrong because registration status alone does not authorize an off-the-books transfer; the documentation is the point. C invents a quantity threshold that does not exist for this rule. D invents a notification cure that does not make an undocumented transfer lawful.
Question 3. A hospital pharmacist finds that a lot of injectable drug was held in a warehouse with a leaking roof and may have been contaminated by standing water. The printed labeling on each vial is complete and accurate. Under the FDCA, this drug is best described as:
- A. Misbranded, because holding conditions are a labeling matter.
- B. Adulterated, because it was held under insanitary conditions where it may have been contaminated.
- C. Both adulterated and misbranded, because any violation triggers both.
- D. Neither, because the label is accurate and complete.
Show the answer
Answer: B. Adulteration goes to the physical condition of the product; a drug held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been contaminated is adulterated [21 USC 351(a)–(c)]. A is wrong because holding conditions affect the product, not the labeling; that is adulteration, not misbranding. C is wrong because a defect does not automatically create both violations; the facts describe a product defect only, and the labeling is accurate. D is wrong because an accurate label does not cure a contaminated product; the drug is still adulterated.
Unlock the full 12-question sampler
All 12 come with the same written explanations the book uses, covering why the right answer is right. We email you the PDF, nothing else.
What you get
The sampler is free. Here is exactly what lands in your inbox.
Print it or work it on screen, then score yourself against the answer key.
Nothing is written for marketing. Every question is lifted from the study guide itself, after the same accuracy checks.
A few days later we send one email with a code for the full study guide. That is the entire sequence.
The full Pennsylvania MPJE study guide
The complete guide covers the law the Pennsylvania MPJE tests in plain English, drafted from the statutes and verified against them, with the full practice question bank behind these samples. Every paperback includes the PDF, delivered instantly.
From $29.99
Mortar & Law is an independent publisher. MPJE is a registered trademark of the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (NABP), which does not sponsor or endorse this product. This page and the sampler are independent study material and are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by NABP.